Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Sexual Penetration of a Child Under 16
In Victoria, sexual penetration of a child under 16 carries a maximum penalty of up to 25 years imprisonment depending on the age of the victim and whether they were under your care, supervision or authority at the time of the offence.
The following table sets out the relevant maximum penalties:
|Age of Victim (and circumstances if applicable)||Maximum Penalty|
|Under 12||25 years imprisonment|
|12 to 16 and under the care, supervision or authority of the accused||15 years imprisonment|
|All other cases||10 years imprisonment|
The Offence of Sexual Penetration of a Child under 16
The offence of Sexual Penetration of a Child Under 16 is contained in section 45 of the Crimes Act which states:
A person who takes part in an act of sexual penetration with a child under the age of 16 is guilty of an indictable offence.
Section 35 of the Crimes Act defines sexual penetration as the introduction, to any extent, by a person of either:
- their penis into the vagina, anus or mouth of another person, whether or not there is emission of semen; OR
- an object or part of his or her body (other than the penis) into the vagina or anys of another person, other than in the course of a procedure carried out in good faith for medical or hygienic purposes.
What the Police Must Prove?
To find you guilty of sexual penetration of a child under 16, the police must prove beyond reasonable doubt that you:
- Took part in an intentional act of sexual penetration with the victim;
- That the victim was under 16 years of age; and
- That you were not married to the victim.
Possible Defences for Sexual Penetration of a Child Under 16
A person charged with this offence can argue in their defence that:
- The victim was 12 or older and consented, and:
- They believed on reasonable grounds the victim was 16 or older; or
- They were not more than 2 years older than them.
What Court will Hear this Matter?
The matter is an indictable offence only, meaning that it must be heard in the County Court.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000