ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
With a cramped time frame, she did in 3 days what another firm dilly-dallied for 7 months. Lisa kept me informed. Helena made me feel comfortable in a sticky situation.
I will definitely be using your company in the future if needed. Lisa kept me at ease also there were no grey areas with great advice. Helana is a great front of house.
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Murder and manslaughter are among the most serious criminal offences in the ACT. They are strictly indictable offences and must be finalised in the Supreme Court after a committal hearing in the Magistrates Court.
The ACT has several different manslaughter offences, which are governed by the Crimes Act 1900. These offences carry penalties of up to 20 years imprisonment.
Section 15 of the Act provides that a person who commits an unlawful homicide that does not amount to murder is guilty of manslaughter. The maximum penalty for manslaughter is imprisonment for 20 years.
Under Section 15 of the Act, a person commits aggravated manslaughter if they commit manslaughter and the victim is a pregnant woman. The maximum penalty for aggravated manslaughter is imprisonment for 28 years.
There are two offences of industrial manslaughter in the ACT.
Under Section 49C of the Act, an employer commits an offence if a worker dies in the course of their employment or dies from an injury sustained in the course of their employment and:
- the employer’s conduct caused the death and the employer was reckless as to causing serious harm to the worker or any worker by their conduct or negligent about causing the death of a worker.
The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 20 years, a fine of 2000 penalty units, or both.
Senior officer offence
Under Section 49D of the Act, a senior officer commits an offence if a worker dies in the course of their employment or dies from an injury sustained in the course of their employment and:
- the senior officer’s conduct caused the death and the senior officer was reckless as to causing serious harm to the worker or any worker by their conduct or negligent about causing the death of a worker.
- The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 20 years or a fine of 2000 penalty units or both.
Manslaughter as an alternative verdict
Under Section 13 of the Act, when a person is tried for murder in the ACT and it appears their actions occurred under provocation and where the jury would otherwise find the accused guilty of murder, the jury must acquit the accused of murder and find them guilty of manslaughter.
An act occurs under provocation where the act is the result of the accused’s loss of self-control induced by grossly insulting conduct of the deceased towards or affecting the accused. In order to amount to provocation, the conduct of the deceased must have been such that it could have induced an ordinary person in the accused’s position to lose self-control to the point of forming the intention to kill the deceased or to be recklessly indifferent as to the probability of causing their death.
Defences to manslaughter
A person charged with manslaughter in the ACT has a number of defences available to them.
A person is not guilty of an offence if they believed their conduct was necessary:
- to defend themselves or someone else;
- to prevent or end a person’s unlawful imprisonment;
When an accused person raises the defence of self-defence, the prosecution then bears the burden of proving that their actions were not carried out in self-defence.
A person charged with manslaughter may argue in their defence that they were suffering from a mental impairment when they carried out the conduct that forms the basis of the charge. The person will be found not guilty under Section 28 of the Code if the mental impairment is found to have had the effect that they:
- did not know the nature of their conduct;
- did not know the conduct was wrong; or
- could not control the conduct.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
Money laundering is an act or acts that conceal the fact that money is the proceeds of crime. In the…
The concept of recklessness has a long and contentious history in our criminal law. Depending on whether or not a…
When someone says “you’re choking me”, the first thing that springs to mind is that they must not be able…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth