Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Fraud is a serious criminal offence in Queensland carrying a maximum penalty of 12 years imprisonment in some instances.
The Offence of Fraud
The offence is created by section 408C of the Queensland Criminal Code whish says:
“(1) A person who dishonestly—
- applies to his or her own use or to the use of any person—
- property belonging to another; or
- property belonging to the person, or which is in the person’s possession, either solely or jointly with another person, subject to a trust, direction or condition or on account of any other person; or
- obtains property from any person; or
- induces any person to deliver property to any person; or
- gains a benefit or advantage, pecuniary or otherwise, for any person; or
- causes a detriment, pecuniary or otherwise, to any person; or
- induces any person to do any act which the person is lawfully entitled to abstain from doing; or
- induces any person to abstain from doing any act which that person is lawfully entitled to do; or
- makes off, knowing that payment on the spot is required or expected for any property lawfully supplied or returned or for any service lawfully provided, without having paid and with intent to avoid payment;
commits the crime of fraud.”
‘Property’ for the purpose of section 408C includes money and also extends to other non-physical things like credit arrangements or a release of an obligation.
There are two types of fraud which can be committed when a person engages in dishonest conduct of the kind referred to above – fraud simpliciter, and aggravated fraud.
If you have been charged with fraud, or if you are aware that you are being investigated by the Police or another agency for fraud, it is important that you obtain legal advice, and likely representation, as a matter of urgency.
Fraud simpliciter, or simply ‘fraud’ is punishable by a maximum of 5 year’s imprisonment and is committed when a person engages in one or more of the types of conduct contained in subsections 408C(1)(a)-(h) without a circumstance of aggravation (which would result in an offence of aggravated fraud).
Likely Penalty for Fraud
The penalty which a court imposes for a fraud offence will be influenced by a number of factors, most particularly, the offender’s prior criminal history (if any), the sophistication of the fraud and the sum of money or quantum of other property defrauded.
A first offender whose fraud is small and not connected to any sophisticated dishonesty, might receive a fine, or a community based order (for example a community service or probation order). Even in less serious cases convictions are normally recorded for fraud offences.
For repeat offenders, in particular people who repeatedly engage in the same sophisticated scheme to defraud others, sentences of imprisonment are not uncommon, often with a period of time spent in ‘actual custody’ within a prison.
If you committed fraud to support an addiction, for example to gambling, or for other reasons which were not based on greed, it might be possible to argue that a lesser penalty should be imposed upon you.
If you have been convicted of fraud and are facing sentence, a well planned and argued plea in mitigation can have a marked impact on the outcome you receive. Armstrong Legal’s criminal lawyers are experienced at representing clients at plea and sentence hearings and we stand ready to assist you, or a family, member who might be facing such an occasion.
Aggravated fraud is committed in circumstances where a director, trustee or employee commits fraud against the corporation which they are a director of, the trust they are trustee of, or the business they are employed by. The crime of fraud is also, automatically, aggravated when the value of the property defrauded exceeds $30,000. The maximum penalty for aggravated fraud is 12 years imprisonment.
Likely Penalty for Aggravated Fraud
The penalty which a court imposes for an aggravated fraud offence will be influenced by a number of factors, most particularly, the offender’s prior criminal history (if any), the sophistication of the fraud and the sum of money or quantum of other property defrauded.
If you are convicted of an offence of aggravated fraud, as a starting point, it is reasonable to expect that you will be sentenced to a term of imprisonment unless some exceptional circumstances of your case warrant a lesser penalty. This is true even if you are a first offender.
For repeat offenders, in particular people who repeatedly engage in the same sophisticated scheme to defraud others, a lengthy custodial sentence can be expected.
If you committed aggravated fraud to support an addiction, for example to gambling, or for other reasons which were not based on greed, it might be possible to argue that a lesser penalty should be imposed upon you.
If you have been convicted of aggravated fraud and are facing sentence, a well planned and argued plea in mitigation can have a marked impact on the outcome you receive. Armstrong Legal’s criminal lawyers are experienced at representing clients at plea and sentence hearings and we stand ready to assist you, or a family member, who might be facing such an occasion.
What Must be Proved
In order to convict you of fraud, or aggravated fraud, it must be proved that:
- You engaged in one of the actions set out in subsection 408C(1), and
- You did so dishonestly
To prove that you did something dishonestly, the prosecution must establish that your conduct was dishonest by the standards of ordinary and reasonable people. It does not necessarily matter if you considered your actions to be dishonest, so long an ordinary and reasonable person would objectively consider that they were.
Possible Defences to a Fraud Charge
In addition to the ‘ordinary defences’ which apply to most criminal matters, namely that you were not the person who committed the offence or you did not engage in the conduct which gave rise to the offence, it is also a defence to a charge of fraud, or aggravated fraud, if you had a genuine and honest claim of right over the property which you have been charged with defrauding.
It might also be a defence to a charge of fraud, or aggravated fraud, if you can establish that your conduct was not, in fact, dishonest. An example of such a case might be where a person tricks a thief into returning stolen property to its rightful owner.
Which Court Will Hear My Matter?
A charge of fraud, whether fraud simpliciter or aggravated fraud, will be heard and determined in the District Court.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000