ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
With a cramped time frame, she did in 3 days what another firm dilly-dallied for 7 months. Lisa kept me informed. Helena made me feel comfortable in a sticky situation.
I will definitely be using your company in the future if needed. Lisa kept me at ease also there were no grey areas with great advice. Helana is a great front of house.
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Manufacturing Controlled Precursor For Manufacture Of Controlled Drug
It is an offence in the ACT to manufacture a “controlled precursor” for the purpose of manufacturing a controlled drug. The maximum penalty for manufacturing a controlled precursor ranges from seven to 25 years’ imprisonment, depending on the quantity of the precursor involved.
What Is a Precursor?
A precursor is an ingredient or substance that can be used along with other ingredients or substances to make an illegal drug. Precursors include things such as chemicals, plants, fungi or other natural organisms.
What Is Manufacture?
“Manufacture” of a substance is defined by the Criminal Code 2002 as any process by which the substance is produced (other than the cultivation of a plant), and includes the process of:
- extracting or refining it; or
- transforming it into a different substance.
The Code says that a person “manufactures” a substance if the person:
- engages in its manufacture; or
- exercises control or direction over its manufacture; or
- provides or arranges finance for its manufacture.
The Offence Of Manufacture Controlled Precursor For Manufacture Of Controlled Drug
Section 611 of the Code states that a person commits an offence if they a large commercial quantity of a controlled precursor:
- with the intention of manufacturing a controlled drug; and
- with the intention of selling any of the manufactured drug or believing that someone else intends to sell any of the manufactured drug.
The maximum penalty is 2500 penalty units and/or 25 years imprisonment.
Further, a person commits an offence if the person manufactures a large commercial quantity of a controlled precursor:
- with the intention of selling any of it to someone else; and
- believing that the other person intends to use it to manufacture a controlled drug.
If the quantity involved is a commercial quantity, as opposed to a large commercial quantity, the maximum penalty is 1500 penalty units and/or imprisonment for 15 years. The maximum penalties reduce further, to 700 penalty units and/or imprisonment for 7 years, if less than a commercial quantity is involved.
The Offence of Manufacturing a Large Commercial Quantity of a Controlled Precursor
Section 610 of the Code outlines that a person commits an offence if they:
- sell a large commercial quantity of a controlled precursor; and
- believe that the person to whom it is sold, or someone else, intends to use any of it to manufacture a controlled drug.
The maximum penalty is 2500 penalty units and/or 25 years imprisonment. If the matter involves a commercial quantity, the maximum penalty is 1500 penalty units and/or imprisonment for 15 years, dropping to 700 penalty units and/or imprisonment for 7 years in cases not involving commercial quantities.
What actions might constitute manufacturing a controlled precursor for manufacture of controlled drug?
- being found in a shed or caravan working with phenyl-2-propanone (P2P), pseudoephedrine’s precursor, which can be used to make methamphetamine without requiring pseudoephedrine, in order to make and sell methamphetamine.
- going to your friend’s house who makes and sells phenyl-2-propanone and helping them by operating machinery used to make P2P.
What the police must prove
The police must prove:
- that you manufactured something;
- that what you manufactured was a controlled precursor; and
- that you intended to manufacture a controlled drug, and
- that you intended to sell it, or believed that someone else intended to sell it; or
that you intended to
- sell any of it to someone else; and
- believed that the other person intended to use it to manufacture a controlled drug.
A person charged with this offence can defend the charge by arguing that:
- they were not “manufacturing” anything, as per the definition in the Code;
- that the substance is not a precursor;
- that they had no intention or belief that the drug would be sold.
Which court will hear your matter?
The more serious of the precursor charges – those carrying maximum penalties of more than 10 years’ imprisonment – are strictly indictable and must be decided in the ACT Supreme Court. The seven-year offences can be dealt with in the ACT Magistrates Court.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
Money laundering is an act or acts that conceal the fact that money is the proceeds of crime. In the…
The concept of recklessness has a long and contentious history in our criminal law. Depending on whether or not a…
When someone says “you’re choking me”, the first thing that springs to mind is that they must not be able…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth