Get an Appointment with a Lawyer Now

1300 038 223
Lawyers available 24/7 for criminal matters
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Majority Verdict in a Trial


Up until recently, every jury member had to be in agreement before a person could be found guilty or not guilty at their trial. This has now changed. With state offences, a person can be found guilty or not guilty by a majority verdict.

A majority verdict means:

  • a verdict agreed to by 11 jurors where the jury consists of 12 persons at the time the verdict is returned, or
  • a verdict agreed by 10 jurors where the jury consists of 11 persons at the time the verdict is returned.

What are the requirements for a majority verdict?

  • The jury must consist of at least 11 persons for a majority verdict in criminal proceedings.
  • A unanimous verdict (verdict agreed to by all members of the jury) cannot be reached after a reasonable time (at least 8 hours) after the jurors have gone to the jury room to consider their verdict.
  • The judge is not to advise the jury of its right to bring in a majority verdict until the judge has determined what is reasonable for the particular trial.
  • The court must be satisfied that, after examination on oath of one or more of the jurors, that it is unlikely the jurors will reach a unanimous verdict if given further time.

Am I entitled to a majority verdict for all offences?

No. A majority verdict is only available to you if you are being tried for a state offence. If you are on trial for a Commonwealth offence, a majority verdict is not permissible. A Commonwealth offence includes:

  • forfeiture of child pornography material and child abuse;
  • offences against the Commonwealth government;
  • obstructing or hindering the performance of public protection services and other services;
  • offences relating to the administration of justice;
  • piracy;
  • importation of drugs and Tier 1 goods (eg. steroids).
  • offences relating to postal services.

For advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.

Michelle Makela

This article was written by Michelle Makela

Michelle has over 15 years experience in the legal industry, working across commercial litigation, criminal law, family law and estate planning.  Michelle has been involved in all practice areas of the firm and in her personal practice has had experience in litigation at all levels (State and Federal Industrial Tribunals, the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, Federal...

About Armstrong Legal

Started as Brezniak Neil Smith in a small Sydney office, Armstrong Legal has grown into a national law firm with over 30 years of experience helping Australians handle serious legal matters with clarity and care. Our experienced lawyers support clients in navigating a broad range of legal matters with empathy and professionalism.

Our national team includes lawyers across Australia who support clients from a diverse range of backgrounds with expert advice, capable of and ready to answer your questions about "brisbane district court", "death by dangerous driving" or "can you contest a will after probate has been granted". Whether you're dealing with ASIC offences, addressing drunk driving cases or seeking help with property settlement, our lawyers can help you act quickly, especially where time limits are relevant.

If you've been browsing for "applying for a caveat over probate in nsw application forms", "how can a will be contested" or "family provision legal advice adelaide", our team can explain your options, what your likely next steps may be, potential costs and any time limits that may apply. Get in touch with our friendly team of lawyers now for an assessment of your case.

Call 1300 038 223 Lawyers available 24/7 for criminal matters