ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
With a cramped time frame, she did in 3 days what another firm dilly-dallied for 7 months. Lisa kept me informed. Helena made me feel comfortable in a sticky situation.
I will definitely be using your company in the future if needed. Lisa kept me at ease also there were no grey areas with great advice. Helana is a great front of house.
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Criminal Trials (NSW)
In New South Wales, when an individual pleads not guilty to a matter that is to be finalised in the District or Supreme Courts, the matter will proceed by way of a trial. This article outlines the processes involved in criminal trials in NSW.
The role of the prosecutor in criminal trials
The Office of the Department of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) handles all prosecutions for criminal offences in the District Court and above. The role of the prosecutor, who represents the Crown in criminal trials, is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the offence. The prosecution has the burden of proving every essential fact/element that makes up the offence/s charged.
The defendant or accused has no obligation whatsoever to prove any fact or issue that is in dispute. There is also no obligation for the defendant to call any evidence or prove anything.
Judge and jury in criminal trials
Criminal trials are run either before a judge and jury, or before a judge alone. Most trials in NSW for state offences are before a jury. In order to proceed by judge alone, an application must be made by either the prosecution or defence.
In circumstances where an application is made for a judge alone trial, the legislation stipulates the following:
- The order will be made if both the prosecution and defence agree;
- Where the defence does not agree to a prosecution application for trial by judge alone, the court must not make an order;
- Where the prosecution does not agree to a defence application for judge alone, the court may make an order if it is considered to be in the interests of justice;
- If the trial will involve factual issues that require the application of objective community standard (for example reasonableness or negligence), the court may refuse to make an order for trial by judge alone;
- The court must not make a judge alone order unless it is satisfied that the accused has sought and obtained legal advice in relation to the effect of judge alone order; and
- The court may make an order if it is of the opinion that—
- There is a substantial risk of interference with any jury or jurors; and
- The risk of such offences occurring is unable to be reasonably mitigated by other means.
However, if you have been charged with a federal offence then your case must be heard before a jury. For example, criminal trials for offences contrary to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), must be decided by a jury.
Where a trial is to proceed before a jury, 12 jurors will be selected. In some cases, a judge may decide that additional jurors should be selected to ensure there will be sufficient jurors remaining when the jury is required to consider its verdict. The judge may order up to three additional jurors be selected.
Opening address in criminal trials
Opening addresses are made at the beginning of criminal trials after the jury has been empanelled. The judge will ask the prosecution to present its opening address and inform the jury that the address is to help them understand the evidence that is to follow.
An opening address by the prosecution will typically outline the charges and the evidence the prosecutor intends to present in the trial. The defence can similarly make an address.
The purpose of opening addresses is to provide the jury with an understanding of the evidence that will be given throughout the trial.
Witnesses called by the prosecution will give evidence in criminal trials about what they saw, heard or otherwise perceived. The prosecutor may also introduce other evidence such as photographs, documents, CCTV footage and medical reports through witnesses.
Following a witnesses’ evidence for the prosecution, they can be cross-examined by the defence. Cross-examination is one way for defence to test the reliability, truthfulness or credibility of a witness, and also put the defence case, as relevant, to the witness. The defence can also introduce other evidence such as photographs, documents, CCTV footage and medical reports through witnesses.
The prosecution then has the opportunity to re-examine its witness, if there are any matters that require clarification.
As stated above, the defence is under no obligation to call any evidence or prove anything, and occasionally no defence case will be run.
However, in circumstances where the defence does present a case to the jury, any witnesses called will follow the same process as for the prosecution case.
Closing submissions in criminal trials
Following the conclusion of the defence case, or the completion of the prosecution case, each side will have the opportunity to make closing submissions which are a summary by each party of its case, and how the evidence that has been heard should be applied to each party’s case.
Summing up and deliberation in criminal trials
Following closing submissions, the judge will ‘sum-up’ the case for the jury. A summing-up should include a summary of the evidence adduced during the trial and the arguments made by each side. Most importantly, the judge must also give direction on the law as applicable to the case.
After the summing up, the jury will be asked to retire and consider its verdict. If the jury is able to reach a verdict, the court will reconvene and the foreperson will deliver a verdict of guilty or not guilty in relation to each charge.
If the jury is unable to reach a unanimous decision, a hung jury may be declared. However, in certain circumstances, the court will allow a ‘majority verdict’. However, the circumstances where this is permitted will be limited.
Trials for Commonwealth offences must always be determined by a unanimous verdict.
Verdicts in criminal trials
Where the trier of fact makes a finding of not guilty, the individual is acquitted of the offence. If a guilty verdict is reached either by the jury or judge alone, the matter will listed for sentence.
If you require legal advice or representation in relation to criminal trials in New South Wales or in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
When a person is being tried for a crime in the District Court or Supreme Court, there are numerous procedural…
In New South Wales, when an adult is charged with a summary offence, the matter is finalised in the Local…
A defendant facing criminal charges in the New South Wales Local Court can make an application under section 14 of…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth