ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
R v McHughes: The Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List (ACT)
The difficulties of sentencing people who have drug, alcohol and mental health issues are manifold and complex. Parliaments in many jurisdictions have wrestled with these problems and this has seen the emergence of drug courts and in the ACT, the Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List (DASL) in the Supreme Court. Courts struggle in finding the right option when dealing with offenders with these issues and often look for alternatives to full-time custodial sentences, even where professional assessments might suggest that such alternatives are not viable. This was the case in the recent ACT Supreme Court decision of R v McHughes  ACTSC 92 which was decided by Acting Justice Refshauge. This article outlines the examination that decision gave to the assessment processes followed when referring a matter to the Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List.
R v McHughes
The defendant, in this case, pleaded guilty to burglary, aggravated burglary and theft, with maximum penalties of 14, 20 and 10 years respectively. He was committed for sentence from the ACT Magistrates Court to the ACT Supreme Court.
Routine initial assessments were made in relation to keeping the defendant out of prison and placing him on a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order. Those assessments were largely against such a course.
The Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List
Justice Refshauge outlined the system in relation to Drug and Alcohol Treatment Orders, which commenced only on 3 December 2019. To be eligible to be placed on such an order, an offender must be likely to be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least one year but not more than four years.
His Honour then looked at the reports required and found that parliament had been silent on “the nature and purpose of such assessments” and on “the process for preparing them”. These matters were not set out in legislation and both the Explanatory Statement and the Supplementary Explanatory Statement from the relevant minister were “of no help, as they merely paraphrase the legislative provisions.”
To be assessed for a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order, the defendant and the prosecution must sign “the standard threshold eligibility assessment form”. The court then refers the matter to the appropriate (DASL) list. The threshold eligibility assessment is completed prior to the court appearance.
At the court appearance, the presiding judge will either:
- Refer the defendant for a full assessment in accordance with the court’s suitability assessment protocol. In this case, the matter will be listed for sentence approximately six weeks later; or
- Determine that the defendant is not suitable for further assessment and set the matter for sentencing.
A participant in the DASL needs to attend frequent review hearings at which the judge will consider his or her compliance. At such hearings, the judge may reward or sanction the participant.
R v McHughes allowed further assessment for Drug and Alcohol Sentencing List
Justice Refshauge found there were broadly two assessments happening in the system. Firstly an “eligibility assessment” should make recommendations as to where a defendant should progress to a “suitability assessment”. In the same manner as an “eligibility assessment”, the judge found that a “suitability assessment” was “a term used without express legislative authority”.
A complete Suitability Assessment is a complex and time-consuming operation, meaning such an assessment should not be sought “if there is no real prospect that a Treatment Order can or should be made”, the judge said.
Justice Refshauge had before him two eligibility assessments, one from Alcohol and Drug Services and the other from Forensic Mental Health Services of Justice Health Services. Both assessments had been carried out quickly in the cells on the morning that the offender was committed to the Supreme Court.
The judge said, “They both identify significant mental health issues which, the author of the Forensic Mental Health Services’ assessment, a registered nurse, regarded as posing ‘a considerable impediment to [the offender’s] engagement in DASL’s screening processes in a comprehensive manner’ and that, according to the author of the Alcohol and Drugs Services’, a social worker, he ‘is likely to find participation in a AOD [alcohol and other drug] treatment challenging due to his comprehension and persistent symptoms’,” His Honour said. “That author added that ‘counselling or group work is unlikely to be beneficial’.
“Issues of comprehension are complicated and, to some extent, depend on the circumstances in which the interviews are conducted, not in the sense of the professional capacity of the interviewer, but in the sense of whether the interviewee can give the best account of him or herself.’
On top of that, it did not allow for an explanation of any supports or assistance, or of whether the disabilities identified could be mitigated to an appreciable extent. His Honour ruled, “I accept that it is not unreasonable for [the offender] to have an opportunity to show whether, in a less concentrated circumstance with less pressure, he may be able to show that he can participate in the Treatment Order process and that he will be able to perform adequately in the rehabilitation processes that will be required of him.”
Therefore, notwithstanding the negative assessments, he ordered the further suitability assessment, giving the offender another chance to avoid prison.
When an offender gives information to police and the courts in relation to criminal offences committed by others, this can…
A recent decision of Acting Chief Justice Burns in the ACT Supreme Court demonstrates very clearly two sentencing options that…
In the Australian Capital Territory, protection orders can be made under the Domestic Violence and Protection Orders Act 2008. The…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth