ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
With a cramped time frame, she did in 3 days what another firm dilly-dallied for 7 months. Lisa kept me informed. Helena made me feel comfortable in a sticky situation.
I will definitely be using your company in the future if needed. Lisa kept me at ease also there were no grey areas with great advice. Helana is a great front of house.
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Section 14 Orders: Diversion Under the Mental Health Act (NSW)
The Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 was assented to in June 2020 and has now replaced the previous act, the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990. This Act changes the way the court system deals with defendants who are found to have mental health conditions or cognitive impairments and subsequently have charges withdrawn. The Act allows such defendants to be dealt with by way of Section 14 orders.
Section 32 Orders Replaced With Section 14 Orders
A significant reform that the new Act represents is that section 32 mental health orders no longer exist. Rather, the new Act provides a similar and updated process for eligible persons charged with summary offences to apply for.
What Are Section 32 Orders?
Previously, Section 32 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 gave the court the power to divert an offender who was suffering from a mental health condition into the care and treatment of mental health professionals instead of dealing with them through the criminal justice system. The court could deal with a matter under section 32 if it considered that it was more appropriate for the person to be dealt with via a treatment or support plan than through the criminal justice system. This could occur at the application of the defence or prosecution or at the court’s own initiative.
A Section 32 application was usually supported by evidence from a mental health professional. This was generally in the form of a report that set out why such a course of action would be beneficial for the defendant and for the wider community. The magistrate had to be persuaded that it was more appropriate to deal with the matter under the mental health act than through the sentencing options available to the court. If the application was successful, the defendant was subjected to the conditions under the plan for a period of six months. If the defendant did not comply with the plan, they could be called back to court and dealt with by way of the usual sentencing process.
What Are Section 14 Orders?
With the new Act now in force, mental health orders will be made under section 14. These orders allow for a defendant with a mental health or a cognitive impairment to be released into the care of another person, on the proviso that they undertake a treatment or support program, or without any conditions. Making such an order does not constitute any finding in relation to a criminal charge whatsoever.
These new section 14 orders are very similar to the old section 32 orders but with three significant changes as discussed below:
The first difference is the definitions of mental health impairment and cognitive impairment, which are contained in part 1 of the new Act.
Section 4 of the new Act defines mental health impairment as “a temporary or ongoing disturbance of thought, mood, volition, perception or memory”. The impairment must be regarded as significant for clinical diagnostic purposes and must affect the person’s emotional wellbeing, judgment or behaviour.
A mental health impairment may arise as a result of a number of listed disorders – including anxiety, and an affective disorder including clinical depression and bipolar disorder, a psychotic disorder or a substance-induced disorder that’s not temporary – and it may also arise due to other reasons. However, a mental health impairment cannot be a temporary effect of ingesting a substance or a substance use disorder.
Section 5 states that a person has a cognitive impairment if they have an ongoing impairment in adaptive functioning and “an ongoing impairment in comprehension, reason, judgment, learning or memory”. However, the Act also states that cognitive impairments must result from a condition that leads to damage, dysfunction, developmental delay or deterioration of the person’s brain or mind.
Cognitive impairments can result from intellectual disability, borderline intellectual functioning, dementia, an acquired brain injury, drug or alcohol-related brain damage, such as foetal alcohol spectrum disorder or from some other reason.
List of factors for Magistrate to consider
Another major reform to the mental health order process, contained within section 15 of the new Act, is that it provides a list of factors that a magistrate may consider when deciding whether to grant a diversion. These include the nature of the person’s mental health impairment, the seriousness and circumstances of the offence/s, the suitability of sentencing options for the person if they are found guilty, and any changes that have occurred in the defendant’s situation since the alleged offending.
Other factors the court will consider are the defendant’s criminal history, whether a defendant has been the subject of a previous mental health order, whether a treatment plan has been prepared and the content of that plan, and whether the defendant represents a danger to themselves, a victim or anyone else.
Extension of monitoring period to 12 months
The third change to mental health order procedures brought by the new legislation is that magistrates may now call discharged defendants back into court to face their original charges if they have failed to follow their treatment or support program for up to 12 months from the date the order was made. Under the previous section 32 scheme, a magistrate could only call the subject of an order back into court in relation to the matter for a period of up to six months after the order was made.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
When a person is being tried for a crime in the District Court or Supreme Court, there are numerous procedural…
In New South Wales, when an adult is charged with a summary offence, the matter is finalised in the Local…
A defendant facing criminal charges in the New South Wales Local Court can make an application under section 14 of…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth