I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Will Bail Be Granted? (NSW)
When a person has been charged with criminal offences, they may be remanded in custody or granted bail until the matter is finalised. This article outlines the steps a court must go through when deciding whether bail should be granted.
When a person is considering applying for bail in New South Wales, the first step is to determine whether or not the offence/s they are charged with is a show cause offence. If it is a show cause offence, then the accused must show cause as to why their continuing detention is not justified. If they are able to show that it is not, the court will then determine whether or not granting bail will pose an unacceptable risk. This process is illustrated in the diagram below.
If the accused has shown cause, or if they have been charged with an offence for which they are not required to show cause, the court will apply a two-step test to determine whether or not they are an unacceptable risk.
First, the court must determine whether or not there are bail concerns. If any concerns are identified, then any relevant considerations that would mitigate the bail concerns will be taken into account. This process is illustrated in the diagram below.
This process allows the court to determine whether if the accused is granted bail, there will be an unacceptable risk to the safety of the victim and the community, or of the accused failing to appear at court. If there are no bail concerns, bail must be granted. If there are bail concerns but these concerns can reasonably be mitigated by the imposition of one or more conditions, bail must be granted conditionally. If there is an unacceptable risk that cannot be reasonably mitigated, bail must be refused.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
Bail is the conditional released of an accused into the community before their criminal charges have been finalised. Bail can…
A 'show cause' offence is an offence for which the accused must 'show cause' why their continuing detention is not…
When a person is charged with criminal offences, they may be granted bail or remanded in custody. When a person…
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth