-
ACT Articles
-
National Articles
-
NSW Articles
-
QLD Articles
-
VIC Articles
-
WA Articles
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
- Client
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
- Client
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
- Client
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
- Client
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
-
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
- Client
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
- Client
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
- Client
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
- Client
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
-

This article was written by Michelle Makela - Legal Practice Director
Michelle has over 15 years experience in the legal industry, working across commercial litigation, criminal law, family law and estate planning. Michelle has been involved in all practice areas of the firm and in her personal practice has had experience in litigation at all levels (state and federal industrial tribunals, the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, Federal...
Listening Devices (Vic)
A surveillance device can be a listening device, optical surveillance device, data surveillance device or tracking device, or devices that are a combination of these things. In Victoria, the installation, use, maintenance and retrieval of all surveillance devices is regulated by the Surveillance Devices Act 1999. This article deals with listening devices in Victoria.
What is a listening device?
A listening device is any device that can be used to overhear, monitor, record, or listen to a private conversation, or to words spoken during a private conversation. Hearing aids and other similar devices are not listening devices.
A device does not have to be able to record or transmit the sound to somewhere else to be a listening device. Things like Dictaphones and mobile phones and tablets with recording capabilities are listening devices as are video recorders.
Even if a person’s intention is to listen to something other than a private conversation, the device used may still be a listening device if it is capable of being used to listen to a private conversation.
What is a Private Conversation?
The Surveillance Devices Act 1999 is designed to protect what is said and done in private conversations and activities.
A private conversation is any conversation that takes place in circumstances where it may reasonably be assumed that the participants only want their words heard by the other people in the conversation. It does not include conversations where the participants ought reasonably to expect that they may be overheard by other people.
Conversations held in public places where it can be reasonably expected the conversation would be overheard are not considered to be private.
Listening Device Offences
It is a criminal offence to knowingly install, use, or to maintain or repair a listening device used to:
- Record;
- Listen to;
- Overhear; or
- Monitor
a private conversation.
However, a person does not commit an offence if:
- They are a participant in the conversation that is recorded;
- They have permission from everyone else who is participating in that conversation; or
- They are authorised to use the device by a warrant or under a law.
It is an offence to communicate or publish any information about a private conversation or activity that was gained as a result of the use of a surveillance device, such as a listening device.
However, no offence is committed if what was communicated or published is no more than what is reasonably necessary to protect the lawful interests of the person publishing or communicating the information.
Warrants
A law enforcement officer may apply for a surveillance device warrant to record private conversations or activities. A warrant can only be obtained if the police have reason to suspect or believe that:
- An offence has been, is being, is about to be, or is likely to be committed; and
- A surveillance device needs to be used in the investigation and collection of evidence of that crime.
Warrants can be issued by a Magistrate or Judge and the issue of warrants is overseen by the Public Interest Monitor. If granted, a warrant will authorise the use of a specific type of device on specified premises. A warrant may allow entry by force, if necessary, to install and later to retrieve the device.
Penalties
The maximum penalty for most offences under the Surveillance Devices Act is a fine of $37,310, two years in prison or both. The maximum penalty for a company is a fine of $186,552.
Listening Devices in the workplace
In workplaces, listening devices and other surveillance devices are not allowed to be installed in any washrooms, toilets, change rooms or lactation rooms, unless they are used in accordance with a warrant or is otherwise authorised by law.
The maximum penalty that applies to individuals is two years in prison, a fine of $37,310 or both. The maximum penalty that applied to a company is a fine of $186,552.
Protected Information
Protected information is information that is:
- Obtained with a surveillance device under a warrant or an emergency authorisation;
- That relates to an issue, application, existence, or the expiry of such a warrant or emergency authorisation; or
- That relates to an application for the approval of powers under an emergency authorisation.
In some circumstances, it is an offence for a person to use, communicate, or publish information that is protected information. This is an offence if:
- If the accused knows the information is protected information; or
- If they are reckless as to whether they should know the information is protected information.
A person is guilty of an offence if they recklessly use, communicate or publish information they ought to know is protected information. This offence attracts a maximum penalty of a fine of $186,552, 10 years in prison, or both for an individual or a fine of $932,760 for a company.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter please contact Armstrong Legal.
The evidence used in a criminal matter can take many forms, including objects, witness testimony, audio or video recordings, documents,…
The Crimes Act 1958 authorises a police officer to collect a “DNA profile sample” in certain situations. A DNA profile…
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
Sydney Office
Level 35
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Melbourne Office
Level 13
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Brisbane Office
Level 5
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Canberra Office
Level 9
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
Perth Office
Suite 207
22 St Georges Terrace Perth