Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Possess or Control Child Abuse Material Obtained Using Carriage Service
It is an offence to possess or control child abuse material which was obtained or accessed using a carriage service. The offence of possess or control child abuse material obtained or accessed using a carriage service is contained in section 474.22A of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment. As this is a Commonwealth offence, it applies in all states and territories.
When is the offence committed?
The offence is committed where a person:
- has possession or control of material;
- the material is data held in a computer or contained in a data storage device;
- the person used a carriage service to obtain or access the material; and
- the material is child abuse material.
What is Child Abuse Material?
Child abuse material includes material that describes or depicts a person, or a representation of a person who:
- is, or appears or is implied to be, under 18 years of age; and
- is or appears to be subject to torture, cruelty or physical abuse;
- Is in a sexual pose or engaging in sexual activity (or appears to be). This can be with another person but does not need to be; ]);
- Is in the presence of another person who is in a sexual pose or engaging in a sexual activity;
- The material is in way that a reasonable person would find offensive.
Child abuse material also includes material that describes or depicts, for a sexual purpose either:
- an actual, or a representation of, a sexual organ or the anal region of a person who either is, or appears to be under the age of 18; or
- an actual, or a representation of, the breasts,of a female person who is or appears to be under 18 years of age; and
- does so in a way that a reasonable person would consider offensive.
Child abuse material can include a doll or other object that resembles a person (or body part of a person) under the age of 18 where a reasonable person would consider that the doll or object is used to simulate sexual intercourse.
What Is a Carriage Service?
Control Or Possession of Data
Possess or control child abuse material obtained using carriage service includes having the material stored on a computer or electronic device such as a phone or an iPad. It also includes having control of data in a computer that is possessed by another person that may be inside or outside of Australia.
What must be proven?
In order for a court to find a person guilty of this offence beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution must prove:
- That the person had possession or control of material; and
- The material was in the form of data held in a computer or contained in a data storage device; and
- The material was child abuse material; and
- That the person engaged in the conduct voluntarily; and
- That the person intended to engage in the conduct of possession and control.
There is a presumption that if the Police prove the above, that the person used a carriage service to obtain or access the material.
The charge of possess orcontrol child abuse material obtained using carriage service may be validly defended by arguing that:
- The accused’s actions were of public benefit and did not extend beyond that; or
- The person was a law enforcement officer, intelligence or security officer performing their duties and the conduct was reasonable in the circumstances; or
- The conduct was engaged in,in good faith for the sole purpose of assisting the eSafety Commissioner to detect prohibited or potentially prohibited content
What is a Public Benefit?
To determine if the conduct is of public benefit the court makes a determination of the facts and does not consider the motives of the person.
The conduct is only of public benefit if:
- it is necessary for assistance in enforcing laws;
- it is necessary for monitoring compliance with or investigation a contravention of laws; or
- it is necessary for the administration of justice; or
- it is necessary for conducting scientific, medical or educational research that has been approved by the AFP Minister in writing.
As this offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment, it cannot be finalised in a summary jurisdiction. For New South Wales offences this means it must be finalised in the District Court. For ACT offences, this means it must be finalised in the Supreme Court unless the DPP elects for it to remain in the Magistrates Court. Victorian offences will be heard in the Victorian Magistrates Court.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000