ACT Criminal Law
National Criminal Law
NSW Criminal Law
QLD Criminal Law
VIC Criminal Law
WA Criminal Law
I will definitely be using your company in the future if needed. Lisa kept me at ease also there were no grey areas with great advice. Helana is a great front of house.
My legal matter concerning an application for a Domestic Violence Order was managed by Mr Thomas Allen. I am grateful for the outcome he obtained. Without Mr Allen and his ongoing support, I would be certain of a different result. It has been an extremely stressful period. Mr Allen’s astute ability to liaise on my behalf and his expertise was invaluable and for which I am grateful as I am now able to move forward. Thanking you
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armstrong Legal and specifically Mr Thomas Allen for representing me in my recent case. At the outset, I would like to thank Mr Allen for the very professional delivery of his legal service. From the first time that I met Mr Allen, I was very impressed with his demeanour and delivery as he made me feel at ease knowing the severity of my case. Mr Allen not only gave me the possible positive outcomes of the case but also the realisation of the worst-case scenario as far as sentencing goes. … I will certainly be recommending Armstrong Legal to any of my friends or family needing representation in criminal matters. Thank you so very much.
Thank you for your representation and help. Fingers crossed for the next step and parole. I just want to say that from the first phone call to your office, your service has been outstanding and have put my mind at ease. I am glad I picked your number to ring.
Thank you Armstrong Legal, the lawyers that have helped over the past 3 years but more importantly, thank you to Thomas Allen for the major part you and Mr Buckland played. Cannot thank you enough. Cheers.
Hi all. I would like to thank Ms Lisa Riley for all her help with my legal issues this past month. It was the most harrowing experience of my life and thanks to her expertise, professionalism and knowledge of the law, I came out almost unscathed. I have no hesitation in recommending Lisa Riley and Armstrong Legal if you need help. The service is amazing and the cost was very minimal for the great outcome. Thank you Lisa for helping me in the most difficult time.
I just want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My whole life I was thrown away, you made me feel like I did mean something. I could not have asked for a better lawyer. Your compassion and love for your job is inspiring. Your upfront and honesty were muchly appreciated, you are a beautiful person. Thank you for not giving up on me and thank you for all the work you put in. I wish you all the best for the future and I will be recommending you to everyone I know. You're amazing!!!!
I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
The charge of entering a premises differs from the charge of burglary as it refers to a “premises” rather than a “dwelling”. A premises has a wider scope and includes a building or structure of any type.
The offence of entering premises is created by section 421 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 which reads:
- Any person who enters or is in any premises with intent to commit an indictable offence in the premises commits a crime. Maximum penalty – 10 years imprisonment.
- Any person who enters or is in any premises and commits an indictable offence in the premises commits a crime. Maximum penalty – 14 years imprisonment.
- If the offender gains entry to the premises by any break and commits an indictable offence in the premises, he or she is liable to imprisonment for life.
Entering a premises with intent to commit an indictable offence is a serious criminal offence. This is evident by the maximum penalties legislation has decided to impose as punishment. Depending on the presence of any aggravating factors, maximum terms of imprisonment range from 10 years to life.
What is a Break?
A break, for the purpose of subsection (3), refers to any entry to premises that is not achieved by walking through an already open door. A break includes the act of opening an unlocked door and the term defines actions all the way up to forcible entry using tools.
What Actions Might Constitute Entering Premises?
- Opening and entering your unlocked back door looking to steal any valuables.
- Reaching through a window of your neighbour’s house, trying to take the phone from the bedside table.
- Smashing the window of a garage and entering with intent to steal the car.
- Doing a “run-through” of a person’s house intending to seriously injure the occupant as revenge for a previous incident.
What is the Difference Between Entering Premises With Intent And Burglary?
The essential difference between entering premises with intent and burglary is the nature of the place which is trespassed upon. The offence of burglary relates to “dwellings” which is a term used at law to describe places used for residential habitation. “Premises” on the other hand is basically any other building (for example a public office or a public facility).
What the Police Must Prove:
In relation to all enter premises offences the police must prove three things in order for you to be convicted:
- that you entered, or were in, a premises; and
- that you did so with the intent to commit an offence (or that you actually committed an offence); and
- that the offence you intended to commit, or did commit, was an indictable offence.
In order for you to be convicted of entering by break it must also be proved that you entered the premises by a break (as described above).
The police do not necessarily need to prove exactly which offence you intended to commit in the premises in order to convict you, but there must be evidence that you intended to commit some form of indictable offence (such as stealing).
Possible Defences to Enter Premises
- Identity – it wasn’t you who entered the premises.
- Lack of intention to commit an indictable offence.
- The location entered is found not to be a premise as defined in the Act.
Which Court Will Hear Your Matter?
This charge can be heard and determined in the Magistrates Court in its least serious form but, more often than not, proceedings for the offence are taken in the District Court.
Types of Penalties
Imprisonment: Even though it is not a sentence of last resort (as it is in some other states) imprisonment is the most serious penalty which a court can impose upon a person. At its most severe a sentence of imprisonment means that a person must spend a specified period of time within a correctional facility, also called a prison, a jail or a gaol.
Intensive corrections order (ICO): An Intensive Corrections Order is, technically, a form of imprisonment but which is served wholly in the community. This means that a person who is made subject to an ICO will not spend any time in prison but will, instead, be required to adhere to a number of requirements that the court will order.
Probation: A court can make a Probation Order either by itself, meaning the whole of the sentence is probation, or as a component of a sentence of imprisonment, meaning that a person is ordered to serve a period of time (not longer than 1 year) in prison and is then subject to a probation requirement upon release.
Community service order (CSO): As the name implies, a Community Service Order is an order which requires a person to perform unpaid work, normally at some kind of community facility, for a stated number of hours (to a maximum of 240) within a nominated time (usually 6 or 12 months).
Recognisance: A recognisance is a promise which a person makes to be of good behaviour for a stated period of time. A court is empowered to release a person who enters into a recognisance, either with a surety, which is a sum of money which the person agrees to pay if they breach the recognisance, or without one.
Fines: A court is empowered to impose a fine, which is a sum of money which a person is required to pay to the State, for any offence regardless of whether the law creating it nominates a fine as part of the applicable penalty.
Section 19 dismissal: A court can discharge a person absolutely, or upon them entering into a recognisance, without recording a conviction against them, if it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
In all cases where you are sentenced to a penalty other than jail, the court can choose not to record a conviction against you, meaning your criminal record will remain clear and any complications with work or travel may be avoided.
For advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
Under section 349 of the Criminal Code 1899, the offence of rape carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. As…
In Queensland, there are a number of offences that a person can be charged with that involve the wilful destruction…
The offence of deprivation of liberty is contained in section 355 of the Criminal Code 1899. It is a misdemeanour…
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth