Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
The charge of entering a premises differs from the charge of burglary as it refers to a “premises” rather than a “dwelling”. A premises has a wider scope and includes a building or structure of any type.
Entering a premises with intent to commit an indictable offence is a serious criminal offence. This is evident by the maximum penalties legislation has decided to impose as punishment. Depending on the presence of any aggravating factors, maximum terms of imprisonment range from 10 years to life.
Common penalties imposed for such a charge are:-
- Intensive Corrections Order
- Community Service Orders (CSO)
- Section 19 order
The Offence of Entering Premises:
The offence of entering premises is created by section 421 of the Queensland Criminal Code which reads:
- Any person who enters or is in any premises with intent to commit an indictable offence in the premises commits a crime. Maximum penalty – 10 years imprisonment.
- Any person who enters or is in any premises and commits an indictable offence in the premises commits a crime. Maximum penalty – 14 years imprisonment.
- If the offender gains entry to the premises by any break and commits an indictable offence in the premises, he or she is liable to imprisonment for life.”
What is a Break?
A break, for the purpose of subsection (3), refers to any entry to premises that is not achieved by walking through an already open door. A break includes the act of opening an unlocked door and the term defines actions all the way up to forcible entry using tools.
What Actions Might Constitute Entering Premises?
- Opening and entering your unlocked back door looking to steal any valuables.
- Reaching through a window of your neighbour’s house trying to take the phone from the bedside table.
- Smashing the window of a garage and entering with intent to steal the car.
- Doing a ‘run-through’ of a person’s house intending to seriously injure the occupant as revenge for a previous incident.
What is the Difference Between Entering Premises With Intent And Burglary?
The essential difference between entering premises with intent and burglary is the nature of the place which is trespassed upon. The offence of burglary relates to ‘dwellings’ which is a term used at law to describe places used for residential habitation. ‘Premises’ on the other hand is basically any other building (for example a public office or a public facility).
What the Police Must Prove:
In relation to all enter premises offences the Police must prove three things in order for you to be convicted:
- That you entered, or were in, a premises; and
- That you did so with the intent to commit an offence (or that you actually committed an offence); and
- That the offence you intended to commit, or did commit, was an indictable offence.
In order for you to be convicted of entering by break it must also be proved that you entered the premises by a break (as described above).
The Police do not necessarily need to prove exactly which offence you intended to commit in the premises in order to convict you, but there must be evidence that you intended to commit some form of indictable offence (for example stealing).
Possible Defences to Enter Premises
- Identity – it wasn’t you who entered the premises.
- Lack of intention to commit an indictable offence.
- The location entered is found not to be a premise as defined in the Criminal Code.
Which Court Will Hear Your Matter?
Entering premises with intent, can be heard and determined in the Magistrates Court in its least serious form but, more often than not, proceedings for the offence are taken in the District Court.
Types of Penalties:
Imprisonment : Even though it is not a sentence of last resort (as it is in some other states) imprisonment is the most serious penalty which a court can impose upon a person. At its most severe a sentence of imprisonment means that a person must spend a specified period of time within a correctional facility, also called a prison, a jail or a gaol. Read more.
Intensive corrections order (ICO): An Intensive Corrections Order (‘ICO’ for short) is, technically, a form of imprisonment but which is served wholly in the community. This means that a person who is made subject to an ICO will not spend any time in prison but will, instead, be required to adhere to a number of requirements that the court will order. Read more.
Probation: A court can make a Probation Order either by itself, meaning the whole of the sentence is probation, or as a component of a sentence of imprisonment, meaning that a person is ordered to serve a period of time (not longer than 1 year) in prison and is then subject to a probation requirement upon release. Read more.
Community service order(CSO): As the name implies, a Community Service Order (‘CSO’ for short) is an order which requires a person to perform unpaid work, normally at some kind of community facility, for a stated number of hours (to a maximum of 240) within a nominated time (usually 6 or 12 months). Read More.
Recognisance: A recognisance is a promise which a person makes to be of good behaviour for a stated period of time. A court is empowered to release a person who enters into a recognisance, either with a surety, which is a sum of money which the person agrees to pay if they breach the recognisance, or without one. Read More.
Fines: A court is empowered to impose a fine, which is a sum of money which a person is required to pay to the State, for any offence regardless of whether the law creating it nominates a fine as part of the applicable penalty. Read More.
Section 19 dismissal: A court can discharge a person absolutely, or upon them entering into a recognisance, without recording a conviction against them, if it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so. Read More.
In all cases where you are sentenced to a penalty other than jail, the Court can choose not to record a conviction against you, meaning your criminal record will remain clear and any complications with work or travel may be avoided.
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000