Defence Of Similar Age (NSW)
Where a person has been charged with a child sexual offence and the age difference between the victim and the accused is not more than two years with the alleged victim being 14 years or older at the time of the offence, they may be able to rely on the defence of similar age. The defence of similar age is a complete defence to certain child sexual offences.
The Legislation:
| Crimes Act 1900
80AG Defence of similar age (1) It is a defence to a Prosecution for an offence under section 66C (3), 66DB, 66DD, 73 or 73A if the complainant is of or above the age of 14 years and the age difference between the complainant and the accused person is no more than 2 years. (2) In any criminal proceedings in which the application of this section is raised, the Prosecution has the onus of proving, beyond reasonable doubt, that the complainant was less than 14 years of age or that the difference in age between the complainant and the accused person is more than 2 years. |
Availability of Defence:
The defence of similar age only applies to the following offences:
- Sexual intercourse – child between 14 and 16 pursuant to section 66C(3) of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual touching – child between 10 and 16 pursuant to section 66DB of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual act – child between 10 and 16 pursuant to section 66DD of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual intercourse – young person between 16 and 18 under special care pursuant to section 73 of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual touching – young person between 16 and 18 under special care pursuant to section 73A of the Crimes Act 1900.
The defence of similar age is only available where consent (or lack of consent) is not an element to the charge. Practically this means that while a person under the age of 16 cannot legally consent to sexual intercourse, the defence of similar age will only be available when the alleged victim agreed to participate in the sexual activity.
Onus of Proof:
The Act states that the Prosecution has the onus (burden) of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged victim was less than 14 years of age, or that the difference between the age between the victim and the accused person was not more than 2 years.
This article was written by Sophie Ogborne
Sophie Ogborne has a Bachelor of Laws from University of Wollongong and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice from the College of Law. She was admitted to practice in New South Wales in 2020. Sophie has experience in criminal law, civil law, family law and in the criminal and equity divisions of the Supreme Court. Sophie now practices exclusively in...
About Armstrong Legal
Having more than 30 years of experience, Armstrong Legal has been helping Australians manage serious legal matters, and we're a national law firm guided by a genuine focus on every client's interests. Our firm has expanded significantly, and we now have a team of lawyers working in numerous states and territories.
Each of our lawyers appears in Court almost daily, regularly furthering their real-world experience to provide confident, informed representation. Additionally, our culturally aware team supports clients from diverse backgrounds and can explain a person's rights and options in plain language to clarify the likely path forward, whether they are searching for "lawyers for traffic offences", "traffic lawyers burwood" or "manslaughter charges".
Our lawyers recognise that being charged with a criminal or traffic offence can be an incredibly stressful time, which is why we carefully consider how to guide you through the legal process. So, if you have questions about "lawyer crime", "traffic offence lawyer" or "disqualified for driving", contact us at Armstrong Legal today.