Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Police have the power to arrest people in certain circumstances.
When exercising the powers of arrest an officer must comply with basic safeguards. These include that the person conducting the arrest tells you that you are under arrest and why you are being arrested.
There is a variety of provisions in the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) that make it an offence to resist being arrested. Even if the police do not charge you with any other offence, you may be charged with resisting arrest if you offer active resistance at the time of your arrest.
When can a Police Officer Arrest?
The NSW Supreme Court has held that police should exercise their arrest powers as a last resort, where issuing a summons or court attendance notice is impractical.
However, a police officer can arrest you when:
- a court has issued a warrant for your arrest (the warrant need not be in the officer’s possession)
- you have committed or are about to commit an offence
- the officer suspects on reasonable grounds that you have committed an offence
- you have breached a bail undertaking or agreement, or the officer believes on reasonable grounds that you are about to do so
- the officer suspects on reasonable grounds that you are unlawfully at large (other than because of escaping from lawful custody), meaning that you are at large at a time when you are required by law to be in custody in a correctional centre
In addition, an arresting police officer must suspect on reasonable grounds that arrest is necessary to:
- ensure your appearance before a court in respect of the offence
- prevent a repetition or continuation of the offence or the commission of another offence
- prevent the concealment, loss or destruction of evidence relating to the offence
- prevent harassment of or interference with a person who may be required to give evidence
- prevent the fabrication of evidence in respect of the offence
- preserve your safety or welfare
When can a Citizen Conduct an Arrest?
A person who is not a police officer may, without a warrant, arrest you if you:
- are in the act of committing an offence
- have just committed an offence
- have committed a serious indictable offence for which you have not been tried
A commander of an aircraft may, on board the aircraft, arrest a person whom he/she reasonably suspects of having committed or having attempted to commit an offence on or in relation to, or affecting the use of, an aircraft. To prevent such an offence or to avoid danger to the safety of the aircraft or passengers, the commander may place you under restraint or in custody, or remove you from the aircraft if it is not in the air.
What Happens if You are Arrested and the Police Have not Followed the Rules?
There are a number of rules outlined in the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) that govern arrests. Unlawful or improper conduct by a person carrying out an arrest can have significant consequences for the outcome of your case, particularly in relation to the following:
The use of force
A police officer or other person who exercises a power to arrest another person may use such force as is reasonably necessary to make the arrest or to prevent the escape of the person after arrest. The use of unreasonable force constitutes an assault. The judge or magistrate will determine whether the force used was reasonable in the circumstances.
The decision to arrest rather than exercise an alternate power
The courts have looked unfavourably on arrests that have been conducted in situations where an alternative power would have achieved the desired result. The NSW Supreme Court has held that a court attendance notice (CAN) or a summons are generally the appropriate way to deal with cases of alleged minor offences.
For example, in DPP v Carr , the Court held that evidence of resisting, assaulting and intimidating police was improperly obtained because the accused was arrested for using offensive language in circumstances where a summons should have been used. Consequently, the magistrate was entitled to exclude such evidence and dismiss the charges.
Special Arrest Provisions for Minors
The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) provides that persons less than 18 years of age are entitled to be dealt with by way of a warning or, if a warning is not appropriate in the opinion of the investigating official, a caution rather than arrest.
This applies where the child has allegedly committed a summary offence (that is, one that is finalised in the Local Court) or an indictable offence that may be finalised in the Local Court.
These special provisions do not apply if the offence:
- is a traffic offence committed by a minor who was old enough to obtain a learner licence to drive the vehicle to which the offence relates.
- results in a death.
- is in the nature of a sexual assault
- is a domestic violence offence under the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW)
- is a serious drug offence
- involves violence
- would be more appropriately dealt with by another means because it is not in the interests of justice to deal with the offence by warning or caution in the opinion of the investigating official
Note that a child is not entitled to a caution if the child has been dealt with by caution on three or more occasions.
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000