I just wanted to thank you for representing me on Monday, I was overjoyed & relieved with the outcome. I don’t think it could have gone any better. All the best, I hope you got to celebrate this one instead after work, you forever made a difference in my life.
I know I thanked you before we parted company but please allow me to reiterate in writing my sincere deepest thanks for defending me in court today. … Armstrong Legal certainly has a great Lawyer you are a credit to the company and I'm quite sure you will secure a very successful future! … My Kindest Regards and Thanks
Anastasia Qvist is an outstanding lawyer. My criminal law situation (family violence order) was difficult, complex and Ana's diligence saved me as I was going through the most difficult period of my life. Ana is down to earth, commonsense and she even kept our costs to a minimum. She is a skilled litigator and knows the ins and outs of the ACT Magistrates Court. She dealt skillfully with the DPP and is an excellent negotiator. You will get a fair representation and she genuinely cares about her clients. She has my complete recommendation. The lady goes to bat for her clients.
I would strongly recommend Anastasia to anyone who is seeking legal representation. As a first-time offender who was charged with a Level 2 Drink Driving offence, she walked me through every step of the matter and was very upfront and clear on all aspects of my case. She was always accessible when I needed advice. Her approach and advice were excellent. Under her representation, I received the best possible outcome and managed to avoid a criminal conviction. She was a pleasure to deal with throughout the whole matter.
Anastasia Qvist was very professional and helpful in every step of my matter. I got a very good outcome and I can’t thank you enough for your hard work and the Armstrong Legal team in Canberra. I would highly recommend her!!!
Throughout Angela has been the consummate professional. She maintained a calm, yet strong demeanour remained informative and completely open in her communication and took complete ownership of the situation. We felt confident we finally had an advocate to steer us out of the nightmare we were in, and she did so with great respect and sincerity. I cannot speak more highly of Angela. She has literally rescued our family from what looked very much like a hopeless future.
Words can’t describe how grateful I am to Trudie Cameron being my solicitor and to Andrew Tiedt presenting my case in the court. They both have been very supportive and amazingly professional and effective. I’ve got an absolutely fantastic outcome I couldn’t even dream about.
Soon after meeting Andrew I knew he was the solicitor I wanted to handle my matter. He immediately sprang into action which brought me stability and hope during a tumultuous time in my life. Andrew was never afraid to give me straight answers to my tough questions which is a true mark of integrity. He is clearly at ease in the court environment and I believe his calm and measured demeanour went a long way to helping me secure the best result from my day in court. I would certainly recommend you approach Andrew if you need assistance.
"Andrew Tiedt was very professional and considerate to personal circumstances and gave sound advice that resulted in the best outcome possible. Highly recommended."
Sexual Activity (Excluding Intercourse) With a Child Outside Australia
The Commonwealth Criminal Code provides that it is an offence to engage in sexual activity, excluding intercourse which is dealt with under another section of the legislation, with a child outside Australia.
For the purposes of this offence a child is defined as an individual who is less than 16 years old.
Penalties the court can impose
- Imprisonment (Jail – Full Time)
- Intensive Correction Orders (ICO)
- Suspended sentence
- Good behaviour order
- Fine order
- Non-conviction order
- Reparation Order
- Non-association order
- Deferred Sentence Order
- Combination Sentence
The Offence Of Sexual Activity With A Child Outside Australia:
Section 272.9 of the Criminal Code provides a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment. Conduct can either consist of engaging in sexual activity with a child, or engaging in conduct in relation to a child, with the intention that the conduct result in, and does result in, the child engaging in sexual activity in the presence of that person.
However, where there are aggravating factors to the circumstances, the penalty rises to 25 years under section 272.10. Aggravating factors in relation to this offence include:
- The child has a mental impairment;
- The defendant is in a position of trust or authority in relation to the child, or the child is otherwise under the care, supervision or authority of the person (the Criminal Code comprehensively defines “position of trust or authority” to include: individuals in a guardian capacity, teacher, religious or spiritual leader, medical practitioner, member of police force, employer/manager); or
- The offence is committed on three or more separate occasions.
What Actions Might Constitute Sexual Activity with A Child?
Sexual activity not including intercourse covers a broad range of behaviours including any activity that is of a sexual or indecent manner involving the human body, bodily actions and/or functions, and does not necessarily require physical contact between the individuals engaged in the activity. This includes but is not limited to:
- Kissing, either between the individual and the child, or between two other individuals in the presence of the chid;
- Groping or touching of a sexual nature, either between the individual and the child, or between two other individuals in the presence of the chid;
- An individual exposing themselves to a child for sexual gratification, for example, strip tease or masturbating;
- A child exposing themselves for an individual’s sexual gratification;
Additionally, an individual is considered to have engaged in sexual activity while in the presence of a child if he or she allows a child to see or hear them engaged in sexual activity.
Although such definitions do appear very broad, behaviour that is not captured by the legislation is typically considered to be behaviour where sexual gratification is not intended to be derived by the child’s presence, which also forms a defence to prosecution. This offers a measure of protection for innocent, everyday behaviours between consenting adults, for example, parents kissing in front of their children.
What the Police Must Prove:
To convict someone of the offence, the Prosecution must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
A person commits this offence if:
- The person engages in sexual activity (other than sexual intercourse) with another person (the child); and
- The child is under 16; and
- The sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.
A person commits the offence also if:
- The person engages in conduct in relation to another person (the child); and
- That conduct causes the child to engage in sexual activity (other than sexual intercourse) in the presence of the person; and
- The child is under 16 when the sexual activity is engaged in; and
- The sexual activity is engaged in outside Australia.
Where conduct means:
- An act
- An omission to perform an act; or
- A state of affairs.
Engage in conduct means:
- Do an act; or
- Omit to perform an act.
Possible Defences for Sexual Activity With A Child Outside Australia:
- The defendant can show that they did not intend to derive sexual gratification from the child being present during the sexual activity. For example, a child lying awake in a dark room whilst other individuals engage in sexual activity in the same room unaware, or not turning their minds to the possibility, that the child was awake.
- The defendant believed the child to be at least 16 years old at the time of conduct constituting the offence. In determining this, the judge may take into account whether the belief held by the defendant was a reasonable one in the circumstances.
- In relation to aggravating factors, it is a defence if the defendant can prove they held a belief that the child did not have mental impairment. Again, in determining this, the judge may take into account whether the belief held by the defendant was a reasonable one in the circumstances.
In all the above circumstances the defendant bears the legal burden of proving this defence, which requires it to be proven on the balance of probabilities.
- It is also a defence if the defendant can show that there was a valid and genuine marriage between themselves and the child in the location where the conduct constituting the offence occurred.
Which Court Will Hear Your Matter?
Sexual activity (not including intercourse) with a child outside of Australia is a strictly indictable matter and will be dealt with in the ACT Supreme Court.
Under commonwealth criminal law, there are numerous offences relating to child abuse material. The offence of Use Carriage Service for…
Child pornography, or Child Abuse Material, is illegal in Australia. It is an offence to possess it, access it, solicit…
Commonwealth law provides a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment for this offence, and sentencing practice is that those convicted…
WHERE TO NEXT?
If you suspect that you may be under investigation, or if you have been charged with an offence, it is vital to get competent legal advice as early as possible. Our lawyers are highly specialised in criminal law and will be able to guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.
WHY CHOOSE ARMSTRONG LEGAL?
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
91 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
Nishi, 2 Phillip Law Street
Canberra ACT 2601
22 St Georges Terrace Perth