Defence Of Similar Age (NSW)
Where a person has been charged with a child sexual offence and the age difference between the victim and the accused is not more than two years with the alleged victim being 14 years or older at the time of the offence, they may be able to rely on the defence of similar age. The defence of similar age is a complete defence to certain child sexual offences.
The Legislation:
| Crimes Act 1900
80AG Defence of similar age (1) It is a defence to a Prosecution for an offence under section 66C (3), 66DB, 66DD, 73 or 73A if the complainant is of or above the age of 14 years and the age difference between the complainant and the accused person is no more than 2 years. (2) In any criminal proceedings in which the application of this section is raised, the Prosecution has the onus of proving, beyond reasonable doubt, that the complainant was less than 14 years of age or that the difference in age between the complainant and the accused person is more than 2 years. |
Availability of Defence:
The defence of similar age only applies to the following offences:
- Sexual intercourse – child between 14 and 16 pursuant to section 66C(3) of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual touching – child between 10 and 16 pursuant to section 66DB of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual act – child between 10 and 16 pursuant to section 66DD of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual intercourse – young person between 16 and 18 under special care pursuant to section 73 of the Crimes Act 1900;
- Sexual touching – young person between 16 and 18 under special care pursuant to section 73A of the Crimes Act 1900.
The defence of similar age is only available where consent (or lack of consent) is not an element to the charge. Practically this means that while a person under the age of 16 cannot legally consent to sexual intercourse, the defence of similar age will only be available when the alleged victim agreed to participate in the sexual activity.
Onus of Proof:
The Act states that the Prosecution has the onus (burden) of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged victim was less than 14 years of age, or that the difference between the age between the victim and the accused person was not more than 2 years.
This article was written by Sophie Ogborne
Sophie Ogborne has a Bachelor of Laws from University of Wollongong and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice from the College of Law. She was admitted to practice in New South Wales in 2020. Sophie has experience in criminal law, civil law, family law and in the criminal and equity divisions of the Supreme Court. Sophie now practices exclusively in...
About Armstrong Legal
For more than 30 years, Armstrong Legal has helped Australians manage serious legal matters with clarity and care. From our offices in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Mornington and Geelong, we put clients' interests first and provide guidance that encourages informed decisions.
Our national team includes lawyers across Australia who understand diverse cultures and support clients from a wide range of backgrounds, so you can ask them about topics related to "success rate of contesting a will in nsw", "contesting a will lawyer" or "no win no fee will contesting" with ease. If you are facing legal matters such as de facto relationships, fraud or drunk driving, our lawyers can explain your rights, weigh your options and advise on the likely path forward.
Prior to advising you on your case, our team will ask about the sequence of events, the issues at stake and your preferred outcome. Our lawyers can also help you gain clarity on topics like "no win no fee inheritance solicitors", "eligible person to contest a will victoria" or "drug driving lawyers sydney", so contact us today.