Character References
Previously the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 enabled offenders to provide a ‘character reference’ to the Court on sentence to establish as a factor in mitigation of the seriousness of their offending that the offender was otherwise of good character.
The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Good Character at Sentencing) Bill 2026 will operate to abolish prior good character as a mitigating factor in sentencing under Section 21A of the Act. The practical impact of this amendment means that from the commencement of this legislation, offenders will be unable to tender references from employers, family or friends to the Court that seek to establish they are a person of good character when being sentenced.
Schedule 1[6] of the Bill describes the objects of the amendments as:
- The principle or rule of common law that requires or allows good character to be considered by a Court as a mitigating factor in determining the appropriate sentence for an offence is abolished, and
- A Court, in determining the appropriate sentence for an offence, must not consider evidence adduced solely for the purpose of establishing good character, but this does not prevent a Court from considering evidence adduced for another purpose or principle of, or factor in, sentencing.
The amendment does not preclude Defendants from tendering references or documents which establish prospects of rehabilitation, the Defendant’s remorse and responsibility, the treatment engaged in by the Defendant in response to the offence or other matters relevant to the sentencing exercise.
The change to the legislation only abolishes the use of good character on sentencing. It does not remove or change the availability of a ‘good character’ direction in contested matters such as hearings or trials.
You should obtain advice about whether you should use these kinds of documents at all and their content from an experienced criminal lawyer.
This article was written by Sophie Ogborne
Sophie Ogborne has a Bachelor of Laws from University of Wollongong and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice from the College of Law. She was admitted to practice in New South Wales in 2020. Sophie has experience in criminal law, civil law, family law and in the criminal and equity divisions of the Supreme Court. Sophie now practices exclusively in...
About Armstrong Legal
With more than 30 years' experience, Armstrong Legal has a long history of helping Australians manage serious legal matters with clarity and care. We prioritise our clients' interests and offer clear guidance to support informed decisions, which is why we have offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Canberra, Mornington and Geelong.
Our national team includes lawyers across Australia who understand diverse cultures and support clients from a wide range of backgrounds, so you can ask them about topics related to "traffic lawyer", "family provision legal advice adelaide" or "who can make a claim against an estate" with ease. When dealing with legal matters concerning marriage, money laundering or sexual assault, our lawyers can explain your rights, assess your options and outline the likely path forward.
We may offer a "No Win No Fee" agreement on a case-by-case basis for some family provision claims if you're considering your funding options for legal support while researching "is a text message will valid australia", "traffic lawyer parramatta" or "challenging a will no win no fee". What's more, for certain estate litigation cases, we may provide a Pay-at-End arrangement depending on the client's circumstances, so contact our friendly team now for an assessment of your case.