Identification Evidence
Identification evidence is evidence given by a witness that the accused is, or resembles, the person who committed the offence they have been charged with. Identification evidence that is given by a person who does not know the defendant is often said to be unreliable, which is why there are strict rules about when it can, and cannot be used in court.
The law in relation to Identification evidence is set out in sections 114 and 115 of the Evidence Act 1995.
Section 114 deals with visual identification evidence, which means identification evidence relating to an identification based wholly or partly on what a person saw (but does not include picture identification evidence). Typically speaking this kind of evidence arises when a witness says that they “recognised someone”.
When adduced by the prosecution, Visual Identification Evidence is not admissible unless:
(a) an identification parade that included the defendant was held before the identification was made, or
(b) it would not have been reasonable to have held such a parade, or
(c) the defendant refused to take part in such a parade,
and the identification was made without the person who made it having been intentionally influenced to identify the defendant.
Section 115 deals with identification evidence via pictures and sets out rules as to how, what kind of pictures and and when pictures can be used in identification parades by police.
Even if identification evidence is admissible in a matter, there are exclusionary provisions that might be able to be used to argue that the evidence should be excluded when its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant (see section 137 of the Evidence Act).
Being able to prove that an accused person is actually the one who committed an offence is obviously a crucial part of a prosecution case. A close examination of the prosecution evidence can sometimes reveal issues with identification which might lead to a significant issue for the prosecution.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
This article was written by Angela Cooney
Angela Cooney is the National Practice Director of Criminal Law at Armstrong Legal and is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist. Angela is a confident and formidable advocate for her clients. She commonly appears in very complex and serious matters but is able to assist clients with all kinds of criminal and traffic offences. Angela is an experienced court advocate having...
About Armstrong Legal
Armstrong Legal is a national law firm that helps Australians manage serious legal matters across areas, such as contested wills, criminal law, family law, corporate crime and traffic law. We approach every matter with openness and honesty, ensuring you feel heard, informed and confident in your decisions.
Our national team includes lawyers across Australia who support clients from a diverse range of backgrounds with expert advice, capable of and ready to answer your questions about "grant of probate australia", "contest a will lawyer bendigo" or "traffic lawyer sunshine coast". Whether navigating divorce and separation, dealing with sexual assault offences or needing support on insider trading matters, our lawyers can guide you to act swiftly where deadlines may apply.
We may offer a "No Win No Fee" agreement on a case-by-case basis for some family provision claims if you're considering your funding options for legal support while researching "sexual assault defence lawyer", "inheritance promise dispute sa" or "avo order". Additionally, for some estate litigation matters, a Pay-at-End arrangement may be offered based on the client's circumstances, so reach out to our friendly team today for an assessment of your case.