Sydney Office

Level 35
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000

Melbourne Office

Level 4
99 William Street
Melbourne VIC 3000

Brisbane Office

Level 5
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000

Canberra Office

Level 5
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601

Perth Office

Level 10
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000

Armstrong Legal Logo

Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2019 Armstrong Legal. All rights reserved.

Browsing

Phone 1300 168 676

menu

Toggle Menu Menu

Guideline judgement for dangerous driving offences

Print

Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: (02) 9261 4555

Andrew Fraser

On 20 August 2002 the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal delivered a guideline judgment concerning the offences of dangerous driving causing death and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm.

What is a guideline judgement?

Section 36 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 defines a guideline judgment to mean a judgment containing guidelines to be taken into account by Courts sentencing offenders, including:

  • Guidelines that apply generally, or
  • Guidelines that apply to particular courts or classes of courts, to particular offences or classes of offences, to particular penalties or classes of penalties or to particular classes of offenders (but not to particular offenders).

General principles concerning guideline judgements

The decision of Spigelman CJ in the case of Regina v. Jurisic (1998) 45 NSW LR209 provides an excellent summary of the practical effect of guideline judgments.

Some of the passages from this judgment are set out below:

"Guidelines are intended to be indicative only. They are not intended to be applied to every case as if they were rules binding on sentencing judges. Decisions of appellant courts on sentencing are not to be treated as binding precedents.

"In accordance with this approach, guideline judgments perform a limited role. Nevertheless, in my opinion, such judgments will provide a useful statement of principle to assist trial judges to ensure consistency of sentencing with respect of particular kinds of offences. I reiterate that such guidelines are not binding in a formal sense. They represent a relevant indicator, much as trial judges have always regarded statutory maximum penalties as an indicator."

In the decision of R v Whyte, Spigelman CJ went further to say that "a guideline is to be taken into account only as a 'check' or 'sounding board' or 'guide' but not as a 'rule' or 'presumption'.

The guideline

The Court constructed a typical case for dangerous driving causing death and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm to use as a model against which a sentencing Court can determine whether the case before it is similar or more or less serious.

The Court found that a typical case for dangerous driving causing death and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm is one which has the following characteristics:

  • Young offender.
  • Of good character with no or limited prior convictions.
  • Death or permanent injury to a single person.
  • The victim is a stranger.
  • No or limited injury to the driver or the driver's intimates.
  • Genuine remorse.
  • Plea of guilty of limited utilitarian value.

Guideline with respect to a gaol sentence

A full time gaol sentence will usually be appropriate unless the offender has a low level of moral culpability, as in the case of momentary inattention or misjudgment.

Guideline with respect to length of gaol sentences

For offences of dangerous driving causing death and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm for the typical case:

Where the offender's moral culpability is high, a full time gaol sentence (both non parole and parole period) of less than three years (in the case of death) and two years (in the case of grievous bodily harm) would not generally be appropriate.

Aggravating factors

The court then listed a number of factors which would make the offence more serious then the typical case. The court listed the following aggravating factors:

  • Extent and nature of the injuries inflicted.
  • Number of people put at risk.
  • Degree of speed.
  • Degree of intoxication or of substance abuse.
  • Erratic or aggressive driving.
  • Competitive driving or showing off.
  • Length of the journey during which others were exposed to risk.
  • Ignoring of warnings.
  • Escaping police pursuit.
  • Degree of sleep deprivation.
  • Failing to stop.

Aggravated factors require a harsher penalty

The court said that where the offence is aggravated, an appropriate increment (increase in penalty) is required. Other factors, such as the number of victims, will also require an appropriate increment.



where to next?

In NSW, traffic offences are treated seriously. Therefore, it is important to get competent legal advice as early as possible, whether you have received a penalty notice, had your licence suspended or been charged with a serious offence. Our lawyers are highly experienced and understand the difficulties you face without a licence. We can guide you through the process while dealing with the various authorities related to your matter.

Why Choose Armstrong Legal?

Leading Criminal Law NSW 2017 ISO 9001 Legal Best Practice Accredited Specialists Criminal Law Sydney Business Awards Winner 2011