Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (ACT)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to non-court processes available to help people and organisations resolve a dispute without court action. It can be used in most types of disputes. In the Australian Capital Territory there is no specific legislation that covers ADR but under both the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 and the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002, courts and tribunals can order parties to attend ADR. This article outlines the main ADR options in the Australian Capital Territory.
ADR provides for early resolution of new disputes and faster resolution of long disputes. It allows parties to avoid the expense, time and stress of court proceedings, and allows parties to develop a mutually acceptable outcome.
Other benefits include privacy of discussions, greater flexibility in negotiations, and a greater range of possible solutions than would be available via court proceedings. Also, dispute resolution methods can be incorporated in agreements before disputes arise, so any problem that may develop can be solved quickly and at a lower cost.
This involves an independent mediator helping the parties to solve the dispute by facilitating an agreement between them. It is conducted “without prejudice”, meaning nothing raised in mediation can be used in a later trial without consent. If the mediator agrees, a party can present a lawyer and experts.
If an agreement is reached, the mediator has parties document the agreement and sign it. The mediator gives each party a copy and files a copy with a court registrar. The mediated agreement can be enforced if it has been documented and signed by both parties and either party applies for an order to enforce it.
If an agreement is not reached, the case can go to trial. The failure to reach agreement cannot be used by either party as evidence. The successful party may be able to recover the costs of ADR.
Some courts and tribunals can order that parties in a dispute attempt mediation before the case will be heard.
Conciliation is similar to mediation in that a neutral person helps parties reach an agreement. However, a conciliator is usually an expert on the subject of the dispute and may help advise on the content of the dispute but not determine a result. Some courts and tribunals can order parties to attempt conciliation before going to trial.
Facilitation is similar to mediation in that a neutral person helps parties reach an agreement. However, facilitation is usually used for groups in conflict, such as in planning or body corporate disputes, because it can be used as a forum to express differing viewpoints in reaching an agreement.
Arbitration is a formal process where parties to a dispute choose an independent arbitrator to make a decision. Parties can agree to arbitration but often one party applies and the other party is required to take part. Arbitration is sometimes used when other ADR methods have not worked but is often used in industrial relations disputes or contractual disputes between businesses.
In some jurisdictions the decision is binding and in others, such as in family law and property matters, a party will need to file the arbitrator’s decision with a court for it to be binding.
This process has parties to a dispute present their arguments and evidence to a dispute resolution practitioner. The practitioner is chosen on the basis of their specialist qualification or experience in the subject of the dispute. Unlike conciliation however, the practitioner makes a determination. The determination is usually enforceable through a court.
This involves all parties and their lawyers signing an agreement to reach a settlement without resorting to litigation. This puts the focus on achieving a negotiated settlement.
The ACT Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (ACAT)
ACAT offers ADR for small claims of up to $25,000. The tribunal provides mediation through conferencing. A conference convenor conducts a conference as an informal meeting between the parties with an aim to reach an agreement. If an agreement is reached, the convenor can make orders on the day. If no agreement is reached, the matter is scheduled for a hearing. In some cases, the conference and hearing are held on the same day, called an “conference and immediate determination”. If an agreement is reached, the convenor can make orders. If no agreement is reached, the matter goes to a hearing before a different ACAT member, where a binding determination is made.
For advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.