Dishonest Use of Position
The Corporations Act 2001 requires directors to carry out duties and obligations with due diligence. Directors must, at a minimum, become familiar with the fundamentals of the business, and monitor the company’s activities and finances.
The Act imposes four main duties on directors at section 180-183:
- To exercise care and diligence. The standard is that which a reasonable person might be expected to show in the role.
- To act in good faith and for a proper purpose. The director must act in the best interests of the company, avoid conflicts of interest, and disclose and manage them should they arise.
- Not to improperly use their position. A director must not use their position to gain an advantage for themselves or others, to the detriment of the company.
- Not to improperly use information. A director must not improperly use information they acquire in their role to gain an advantage for themselves or others, to the detriment of the company.
There is a range of offences which can be committed by a director, one of which is dishonest use of position.
Legislation
The offence of dishonest use of position is found at section 184 of the Act. A maximum penalty of 200 penalty units ($44,400), or 5 years imprisonment, or both, applies if a director:
- is reckless or dishonest and fails to exercise their powers and discharge their duties in good faith in the best interests of the corporation or for a proper purpose;
- uses their position, or information gained in their position, dishonestly to directly or indirectly gain an advantage for themselves or others, or cause detriment to the business.
Common ways this offence occurs
A person can find themselves facing this charge when:
- they sold, gave away or used company property for the advantage of themselves or others;
- they entered into a non-arms-length transaction with the company;
- they used the company to pay their personal bills.
What must be proven
The court must be satisfied:
- that the accused was a director, officer or employee of the company;
- that the accused used their position as a director, officer or employee;
- their use of their position was dishonest according to the standards of ordinary people.
Possible defence
This matter can sometimes be defended on the basis that the conduct is not dishonest according to the standards of an ordinary person.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Armstrong Legal.
This article was written by Sally Crosswell
Sally Crosswell has a Bachelor of Laws (Hons), a Bachelor of Communication and a Master of International and Community Development. She also completed a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice at the College of Law. A former journalist, Sally has a keen interest in human rights law.
About Armstrong Legal
Beginning as Brezniak Neil Smith in a small office in Sydney, Armstrong Legal is now a national law firm with more than 30 years of experience helping Australians manage serious legal matters with clarity and care. Our experienced lawyers guide clients through a broad spectrum of legal matters with professionalism and empathy.
We act promptly because we recognise that time limits can apply in different legal matters, whether you're interested in "criminal lawyer gold coast", "inheritance dispute law firm sydney" or "court ordered will nt". Our expert lawyers can provide guidance on matters such as child custody, property settlement and money laundering.
Prior to advising you on your case, our team will ask about the sequence of events, the issues at stake and your preferred outcome. Our lawyers can also help you gain clarity on topics like "criminal lawyers melbourne cbd", "claim super death benefits act" or "inheritance dispute lawyers", so contact us today.