201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
575 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000
Costs orders, that is, an order requiring the “losing” party to pay the legal costs of the “winning” party, are a rarity in Family Law Court proceedings, particularly when compared to other jurisdictions.
This is because section 117 of the Family Law Act makes it clear that subject to the following considerations, each party should pay for their own legal costs:
The Court is also entitled to consider any other matters it considers relevant.
The recent single judge Full Court of the Family Court decision of Justice Strickland, Medlon & Medlon (No. 6) (Indemnity costs)  FamCAFC 157, considered these provisions. The Wife brought an application seeking that the Husband’s legal team be restrained from acting on his behalf, essentially on the basis that there was a conflict of interest. She was entirely unsuccessful and the Husband then sought an order for costs against her.
His Honour not only determined that it was appropriate to make a costs order against the Wife, but went a step further, ordering that the costs be paid on “an indemnity basis” meaning that all reasonably incurred costs incurred by the Husband should be paid by the Wife.
The relevant case law, as exemplified by an often cited authority, Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd  FCA 536, demonstrates that an order for indemnity costs, whilst reserved for exceptional cases, may be appropriate where a party:
In Medlon, Justice Strickland found that the very serious nature of the allegations made by the Wife, which were not verified, coupled with the fact that she should have known that she had no prospect of success justified an order that she pay the Husband’s costs on an indemnity basis.
In my experience, it is very common for family lawyers to assert in correspondence that their client will be seeking costs, often on an indemnity basis. Whilst this is obviously sometimes completely appropriate, it is also regularly a strategy to unsettle and intimidate the other party.
If you find yourself on the receiving end of a letter threatening an application for indemnity costs against you, it is my strong advice that you obtain legal advice if you have not already done so. Not only should this give you an impartial and realistic assessment of the prospects of your case, it may also help quell any misplaced fears by giving you a greater sense of certainty and confidence in your legal position.
Image Credit – Robyn Mackenzie © 123RF.com
Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: (02) 9261 4555
Melbourne: (03) 9620 2777
Brisbane: (07) 3229 4448
Canberra: (02) 6288 1100