201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
99 William Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601
Whilst the idea of a child being required to attend a gaol to spend time with his or her incarcerated parent is abhorrent to most people, it is, nevertheless something that the Family Law Courts have considered from time to time.
An important decision from the Family Court which deals with such a situation is Justice Bennett’s judgement in G & C  FamCA 994. In this matter, the father had been found guilty of four counts of incest with his two daughters, who were teenagers at the time, and was sentenced to seven years in gaol, with a non parole period of four years. The family law matter involved a young boy who was approximately seven years of age when the judgement was delivered and was the step-brother of the two girls that the father had assaulted.
Justice Bennett stated in her reasons:
In many cases the benefit of a meaningful relationship by a child with both parents is not an issue and the court is merely required to determine how that can best be achieved. That is not the case here.
In finding that it was not appropriate for the father to have any direct contact with his son and only have an opportunity to send him letters, cards and/or gifts three times each year by post, Her Honour explained that when considering the benefit to the son of having a meaningful relationship with his father, it was necessary to consider the evidence, and determine how orders could be framed to ensure that the son had a meaningful relationship, if it was in his best interests. This is referred to as the “prospective approach” and has been followed in cases such as the Full Court decision of McCall & Clark  FamCAFC 92.
The prospective approach is contrasted with two other possible interpretations:
Image Credit – Galinast © 123RF.com
Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: (02) 9261 4555
Melbourne: (03) 9620 2777
Brisbane: (07) 3229 4448
Canberra: (02) 6288 1100