Sydney Office

Level 35
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000

Melbourne Office

Level 4
99 William Street
Melbourne VIC 3000

Brisbane Office

Level 5
231 North Quay
Brisbane QLD 4000

Canberra Office

Level 5
1 Farrell Place
Canberra ACT 2601

Perth Office

Level 10
111 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000

Armstrong Legal Logo

Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2017 Armstrong Legal. All rights reserved.

Phone 1300 168 676

When is a statutory declaration not actually a statutory declaration?

When is a statutory declaration not actually a statutory declaration?

This is what the NSW Police have been considering, after an allegation of swearing a false statutory declaration was made in relation to a political hopeful.

Party rules often require that a candidate for pre-selection swear a statutory declaration that confirms certain matters of interest to pre-selectors. The Liberal Party in the electorate of North Shore required that Felicity Wilson confirm that she had lived in the electorate at certain times. It was then alleged that the purported statutory declaration that Ms Wilson signed was inaccurate in the residential history it revealed.

The matter was reported to the authorities, but Police have declined to prosecute, telling media that that the document was not a statutory declaration. It appears that the document Ms Wilson signed suggested that it was a statutory declaration pursuant to the Oaths Act 1990.

The problem for the police is that there is no Oaths Act 1990 – the correct citation is Oaths Act 1900.

It seems somewhat extraordinary that such a technical fault could be enough to terminate an investigation – but it appears that police have formed the view that the document was not a statutory declaration, and as such there could not be a successful prosecution for swearing a false declaration.

Whilst this may seem like a ridiculous distinction, it is a good example of how what seems like an obvious criminal offence may not be so obvious once someone looks at the detail. Certain media outlets may describe this as a “technicality”, but the law is not about what is moral, or what feels wrong – it is about what is wrong according to the law, as passed by the legislature of New South Wales.

In this case, the legislation is precisely drafted, and it is necessary for a court to be satisfied that the precise terms of the legislation have been breached.

It may be the case that Ms Wilson is lucky. It may even be the case that the statutory declaration was intentionally misdrafted. Either way, the authorities cannot prove the offence against her, and it is difficult to criticise their decision to refuse to prosecute.

Image Credit – Iakov Filimonov ©

Written by Andrew Tiedt on July 10, 2017

Andrew has spent many years building a reputation for high quality legal advice and representation. His experience and ability means that his clients are always in safe hands. View Andrew's profile

1 thought on “When is a statutory declaration not actually a statutory declaration?”

  1. JK says:

    Well having avoided many a parking fine on better legal contrivances I suppose you can’t complain but it would be interesting if the Parties have deliberately done this and since rectified things.

    An action in the NCAT are council elections is currently underway on similar issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: (02) 9261 4555
Melbourne: (03) 9620 2777
Brisbane: (07) 3229 4448
Canberra: (02) 6288 1100