127 York Street
Sydney NSW 2000
140 William Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
32 Turbot Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
17-21 University Avenue
Canberra ACT 2601
RELATED TOPICS & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MENU FOR FAMILY LAW
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MENU
INFORMATION ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAW
RELATED SEARCHES FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENCES
FAMILY LAW MENU
NEED A LAWYER?
Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: 02 9261 4555
Canberra: 02 6288 1100
Several studies suggest that domestic violence in Australia is more wide-spread than is commonly perceived. Historically, statistics on domestic violence in Australia were calculated based on report of the incidents. It is now thought that only a small proportion of Domestic Violence in Australia is actually reported.
It is a further misconception that there is little the Court or the Law can do to protect victims of Australian Domestic Violence. Certainly, here in Sydney, that is simply not the case. An entire chapter of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is designed to protect people who fear domestic violence and abuse. These people do not have to have been victims of actual violence, only victims of acts causing them to fear for their personal safety. The New South Wales Crimes Act provides that protection by providing powers to the Local Courts, enabling them to make Apprehended Violence Orders, or AVOs as they are commonly known, to protect people in need.
Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs) are divided up into two categories:
In Australia, Domestic Violence Orders (DVO) are designed to protect people who live in a domestic relationship with the alleged perpetrator and Personal Violence Orders (PVO) are for all other categories of victims.
There is a range of orders commonly made by the Court in relation to Apprehended Violence Order proceedings. Those common orders are as follows:
The orders below must be made in any circumstance where the court is making an AVO
An application for divorce is required to be completed, sworn by the applicant before a divorce lawyer or justice of the peace and filed with the correct filing fee paid. Some applicants may qualify for a waiver of the filing fee.
The orders below are discretionary orders.
Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs) can be made by consent and without any admission of wrongdoing. This can avoid the need for the matter to proceed to a hearing before the court. This can be a cost effective way for parties to resolve a dispute where fear of domestic violence or abuse is an issue. In other cases a full hearing of evidence may be necessary to prove the need for an order to be made. The making of a Apprehended Domestic Violence Order does not necessarily mean the end of a relationship. In the majority of cases where courts make domestic violence orders, the parties intend to continue living in the same house, but with some protection in place.At Armstrong Legal, we have experienced staff who have acted in literally hundreds of domestic violence cases with Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO) before the Court. If you feel you may need the protection of an AVO, or are being prosecuted by someone seeking an AVO, please contact Peter Magee to discuss your matter.
Family Lawyers | Domestic Violence Advice | Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO) | Family Law, Sydney Australia
Under the Family Law Act 1975 there is a presumption that both parents will be involved in making decisions about major long-term issues concerning their children. Major long-term issues include things such as health, education and religion.
In circumstances where there has been domestic violence, or family violence, as it is often referred to, no such presumption applies. It is far more likely that a parent who is seeking sole decision making power about major long-term issues is more likely to be awarded that power by the Court in circumstances where there has been family violence because the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility no longer applies. Ultimately the Court must take a decision in relation parental responsibility, which it considers to be consistent with the child's best interests.
There is a requirement on parties to a family law dispute to engage in what is described as pre-action procedures in an attempt to limit the issues in dispute. In parenting cases this extends to a requirement to attempt to mediate the dispute using the services of a qualified family dispute resolution practitioner. In circumstances where there has been family violence the requirement to obtain a certificate from a family dispute resolution practitioner before going to Court is waived. In other words there is no requirement to mediate where you are able to satisfy the Court that has been family violence.
Property settlements are determined by the Court by considering the contributions and needs of each of the parties to the relationship (for a full explanation of the process please refer to the article titled "THE FOUR STEP PROCESS"
In cases involving domestic violence there is authority for the Court finding that contributions made by a party while suffering domestic violence, particularly ongoing and severe domestic violence, are to be considered more valuable because of the arduous circumstances in which they were made. Accordingly, additional weight given to those contributions if a factor taken into account by the Court in the overall property settlement.
For further information on this topic please the case of Kennon v Kennon (1997) 22 FamLR1
We often see clients who have wanted to report domestic violence "for the record" and who have made a report to the police without being aware of the consequences of making such a report.
We are not suggesting that domestic violence should not be reported, but are advising that there are consequences which flow beyond your control once you make a report.
Once the police receive a report of domestic violence they are obliged, as a matter of law, to take action on behalf of the person making the complaint unless they do not believe the complaint is genuine. The action they are required to take is to file an application with the Local Court for an Apprehended Violence Order protecting the person making the complaint from the alleged perpetrator of the violence. Police usually urn on the side of caution in bringing this application. That means the application will usually be made even if police doubt the veracity of the allegation.
Police can also bring an assault charge against the alleged perpetrator. The person making the complaint is not the person who decides whether or not an assault charge is to be brought. It is a matter for police to determine whether or not an assault charge is to be brought. It is a matter for police to determine whether or not such a charge should be laid as it their role to prosecute breaches of the law when they come to their attention. Police may ask, as a courtesy, whether or not you would like an assault charge to be brought, however they are not bound by your answer and may proceed with bringing a charge even if you do not want them to do so or refuse to assist after making the complaint.
We have seen many relationships breakdown irretrievably and much financial hardship caused by virtue of people reporting domestic violence 'for the record' only to find that it results in court proceedings, a possible criminal record for the perpetrator, possible loss of employment if the perpetrator works in an industry where a criminal conviction prevents them from continuing to work in that industry and significant financial costs in defending any Apprehended Violence Order or defending any charges which may be laid by police.
We repeat, we are not suggesting that domestic violence should not be reported, however you should be aware of the unintended consequences which may flow from the making of a report.
Taking the next step and contacting a family lawyer can be scary. Our lawyers will make you feel comfortable so you can talk about your situation. But first, ask yourself, Do I really need a lawyer ?
Contact Armstrong Legal:
Sydney: 02 9261 4555
Canberra: 02 6288 1100